We noticed that you're using an unsupported browser. The TripAdvisor website may not display properly.We support the following browsers:
Windows: Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome. Mac: Safari.

Hotel Nerva or Raffaello?

dundee
Level Contributor
28 posts
6 reviews
Save Topic
Hotel Nerva or Raffaello?

Hi

I've found 2 hotels I like the look of in Rome, after a week of searching...

I'ts for my boyfriends 40th so I don't want to be disappointed. There's only £40 between the 2 (Raffello being more expensive)

Any suggestions?

Thanks

Carly

Mentioned in this post
Rome
Rome
Lazio, Italy
Appia Antica Resort
Appia Antica Resort
#1 of 1,270 hotels in Rome
Nerva Boutique Hotel
Nerva Boutique Hotel
#6 of 1,270 hotels in Rome
Albergo del Senato
Albergo del Senato
#8 of 1,270 hotels in Rome
Columbia, Illinois
Level Contributor
182 posts
17 reviews
Save Reply
1. Re: Hotel Nerva or Raffaello?

We are staying at the Nerva in November....I had booked a couple of other hotels...but decided this was the best for price and location..... We are taking a cruise when leaving Rome...so figured we would have nice then.....

Post how your trip goes and which you decide on.

Thanks,

Judy

Mentioned in this post
Nerva Boutique Hotel
Nerva Boutique Hotel
732 Reviews
Rome, Italy
Rome
Rome
Lazio, Italy
Cheshire, United...
Level Contributor
6,216 posts
250 reviews
Save Reply
2. Re: Hotel Nerva or Raffaello?

Carly the Nerva has excellent reviews on TA and on venere.. in fact its 45th best on TA and gets 8.7/10 on venere

3. Re: Hotel Nerva or Raffaello?

-:- Message from TripAdvisor staff -:-

This topic has been closed to new posts due to inactivity. We hope you'll join the conversation by posting to an open topic or starting a new one.

To review the TripAdvisor Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow this link: http://www.tripadvisor.com/pages/forums_posting_guidelines.html

We remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines, and we reserve the right to remove any post for any reason.

Removed on: 04 February 2010, 02:16
;